轉
<這不是警察的自我防衛>
肯定有很多人會這麼說，『示威者威脅到了警察的生命，所以警察開槍。』
There must be a lot of people saying, “That protester seriously threatened the officer’s safety so the officer fired a live round.”
不，影片清晰可見，警察拿著左輪手槍的時候是往前行，而不是向後退，那不是自我防衛，那是攻擊的姿態，當你有著所有的武器，警棍，防暴槍那麼多選擇可以用的時候，卻選擇使用手槍，這不是自我防衛。
That claim does not tell the truth. As shown so clearly on many footages, that officer was walking towards, instead of walking away from, the protesters with his pistol in his hands. Therefore, it was not an act of self-defence but an act of aggression. Even when he was given a variety of weapon choices, e.g. batons, pepper spray& rubber bullets, the officer still CHOSE to fire a live round at the 15-year-old kid holding his kick board, and therefore, this is not self-defence.
開真槍這個行為，從警察開始稱呼人們為曱甴的時候我就知道遲早會發生，那是培養警察對人非人化的過程，培養警察對人產生恨意的過程，再加上假新聞，洗腦。連服從命令也不需要，他們自然而然的就已經對黑衣的示威者充滿著仇恨，這是我們的敵人，這是要謀害我們性命的人。
Firing live rounds at HK protesters should not be a surprise from the first day that so-called “HK Police” started calling citizens of HK “cockroaches” to dehumanise anyone opposing their brutality. With the hatred stemming from such dehumanisation and all the brainwashing by pro-Beijing disinformation campaigns, these so-called law enforcement officers, who once took a solemn oath to serve and protect the public, have been blindfolded by their eagerness to hurt black-clad protesters, whom they see as sworn enemies.
所以這一下，是那個警察自己想做的。
Hence, that act of aggression was a voluntary decision made by that officer.
不要再出來行騙，到處幫他解釋他面對多少危險，他多害怕，所以才開槍，你的掩飾無恥得可笑，我卻笑不出。
Stop telling lies about the dangers he faced at the scene or how stressed and frightened he was when he pulled the trigger. Such cover-up is just shameless and demoralising.
這是你們養出來的，殺人警察。
Cops who willingly kill HK citizens are just a product bred by those of you who chose to side with the totalitarian regime, and those of you who refused to stand with the people of HK in this fight for justice, democracy and the freedom from fear.
Search